1
00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:06,469
当地球上最大的公司将6750亿美元投入科技领域时会发生什么
2
00:00:06,469 --> 00:00:07,610
在另一个国家
3
00:00:07,610 --> 00:00:10,898
决定免费提供这项相同技术
4
00:00:10,898 --> 00:00:14,710
瑞·达利欧将桥水基金打造为全球最大对冲基金
5
00:00:14,710 --> 00:00:17,589
他的净资产约200亿美元
6
00:00:18,670 --> 00:00:24,129
他比大多数人了解次级抵押贷款之前就预见到2008年金融危机
7
00:00:24,129 --> 00:00:27,769
上个月他坐下来发表了一个令人担忧的观点
8
00:00:27,769 --> 00:00:31,179
每个持有股票指数基金的人
9
00:00:31,500 --> 00:00:34,479
指出了经济衰退的精确阶段
10
00:00:34,479 --> 00:00:35,439
我们正处于
11
00:00:35,439 --> 00:00:38,820
警告大多数AI公司已成行尸走肉
12
00:00:38,820 --> 00:00:44,310
并指出那个可能一夜摧毁整个AI盈利模式的国家
13
00:00:44,310 --> 00:00:48,090
我觉得你们正走向这场战争
14
00:00:48,090 --> 00:00:49,369
我们正在这场战争中
15
00:00:49,369 --> 00:00:52,990
我们正处于我所说的周期第五阶段
16
00:00:52,990 --> 00:00:54,429
在书中
17
00:00:54,429 --> 00:00:57,530
我描述了反复出现的规律
18
00:00:57,530 --> 00:01:00,380
当你处于这种位置时
19
00:01:00,380 --> 00:01:04,280
当财政状况恶化
20
00:01:04,760 --> 00:01:08,519
伴随巨额财富与价值观
21
00:01:08,519 --> 00:01:12,579
出现分歧与不可调和矛盾
22
00:01:14,459 --> 00:01:19,150
同时面临外部与内部威胁
23
00:01:19,430 --> 00:01:21,049
就会形成这种动态
24
00:01:21,049 --> 00:01:23,030
我认为我们正处于此阶段
25
00:01:23,030 --> 00:01:24,629
我像个机械师
26
00:01:24,629 --> 00:01:25,189
我的目标
27
00:01:25,189 --> 00:01:26,530
我不受意识形态束缚
28
00:01:26,530 --> 00:01:28,030
我只是个务实的人
29
00:01:28,030 --> 00:01:31,090
试图在市场中盈利并解释现象
30
00:01:31,090 --> 00:01:32,469
这就是现状
31
00:01:32,469 --> 00:01:35,370
当我们审视AI泡沫问题时
32
00:01:35,370 --> 00:01:39,879
很多人不了解泡沫的本质
33
00:01:39,879 --> 00:01:43,688
在所有技术领域
34
00:01:43,688 --> 00:01:48,000
人们以为自己在押注技术
35
00:01:48,000 --> 00:01:50,500
当购买公司股票时
36
00:01:51,620 --> 00:01:53,340
并非如此
37
00:01:53,659 --> 00:01:54,159
明白吗
38
00:01:54,159 --> 00:02:01,000
公司与技术的行为存在巨大差异
39
00:02:02,480 --> 00:02:04,969
在这些领域常态是
40
00:02:04,969 --> 00:02:08,389
大量公司将无法存活
41
00:02:08,389 --> 00:02:10,189
极少数幸存
42
00:02:10,189 --> 00:02:12,748
并将激烈竞争
43
00:02:12,748 --> 00:02:14,508
但技术会持续发展
44
00:02:14,508 --> 00:02:15,740
最终将大获成功
45
00:02:15,740 --> 00:02:17,400
技术将会
46
00:02:17,400 --> 00:02:17,819
所以
47
00:02:17,819 --> 00:02:21,340
我要强调这种动态
48
00:02:21,340 --> 00:02:24,340
我可以继续阐述
49
00:02:24,340 --> 00:02:25,699
你知道这是什么样子的
50
00:02:25,699 --> 00:02:26,680
嗯
51
00:02:26,680 --> 00:02:32,000
当然我们在科技泡沫中已经有所目睹
52
00:02:32,000 --> 00:02:33,099
但当时发生了什么
53
00:02:33,099 --> 00:02:37,519
但即使我描述20年代末的情况
54
00:02:37,519 --> 00:02:38,239
但你知道的
55
00:02:38,239 --> 00:02:39,799
这简直难以置信
56
00:02:39,799 --> 00:02:41,519
但技术发展不会停止
57
00:02:41,519 --> 00:02:42,679
但这些公司
58
00:02:42,679 --> 00:02:43,459
呃
59
00:02:43,459 --> 00:02:45,289
未必会持续下去
60
00:02:45,289 --> 00:02:49,530
达利欧推出了一套涵盖数百年经济史的框架
61
00:02:49,530 --> 00:02:52,599
然后直接指向你的投资账户
62
00:02:52,599 --> 00:02:54,800
这里有硬数据支撑
63
00:02:56,000 --> 00:02:57,439
看看这张图表
64
00:02:57,439 --> 00:03:00,840
纳斯达克在3月10日达到548点峰值
65
00:03:00,840 --> 00:03:03,159
到2000年10月
66
00:03:03,159 --> 00:03:04,020
2002年
67
00:03:04,020 --> 00:03:08,919
暴跌77%至1139点
68
00:03:08,919 --> 00:03:09,979
并非缓慢下跌
69
00:03:09,979 --> 00:03:15,509
而是像血滴在屏幕上般一波波清算
70
00:03:15,590 --> 00:03:21,189
到2004年已有半数互联网公司退市
71
00:03:21,189 --> 00:03:25,110
仅存431家
72
00:03:25,110 --> 00:03:28,669
科技ipo在1999和2000年集中爆发
73
00:03:29,750 --> 00:03:32,669
不足半数存活五年
74
00:03:32,810 --> 00:03:36,748
这里有个令人胆寒的数据:亚马逊
75
00:03:36,748 --> 00:03:39,709
如今被视为不可阻挡的巨头
76
00:03:39,709 --> 00:03:43,819
在那次崩盘中市值蒸发90%
77
00:03:43,819 --> 00:03:45,060
它幸存了下来
78
00:03:45,060 --> 00:03:46,180
但大多数没撑住
79
00:03:47,340 --> 00:03:51,180
思科在2000年3月股价达80美元
80
00:03:51,180 --> 00:03:52,360
四年时间
81
00:03:52,639 --> 00:03:55,400
这是思科再次见到该价位所需时长
82
00:03:56,400 --> 00:03:58,340
或许更简单
83
00:03:58,340 --> 00:04:01,990
当整个理论完全正确时会发生
84
00:04:02,120 --> 00:04:04,860
科技理论是正确的
85
00:04:04,860 --> 00:04:07,680
互联网确实改变了世界
86
00:04:07,748 --> 00:04:11,830
但企业层面却惨遭屠杀
87
00:04:11,830 --> 00:04:13,110
达利欧指出
88
00:04:13,110 --> 00:04:15,270
我们正在见证相同模式重现
89
00:04:15,270 --> 00:04:18,230
这次规模更大
90
00:04:18,230 --> 00:04:20,699
让我展示增长幅度
91
00:04:20,779 --> 00:04:25,959
美国科技公司预计在2026年将投入6750亿美元
92
00:04:25,959 --> 00:04:29,110
用于人工智能基建
93
00:04:29,470 --> 00:04:32,529
亚马逊2000亿 谷歌1800亿
94
00:04:32,529 --> 00:04:35,329
Meta 1250亿
95
00:04:35,329 --> 00:04:37,519
1250亿
96
00:04:37,759 --> 00:04:38,660
微软
97
00:04:38,660 --> 00:04:41,839
1200亿 甲骨文
98
00:04:41,839 --> 00:04:44,819
500亿高盛预测
99
00:04:44,819 --> 00:04:46,519
累计达1.1
100
00:04:46,519 --> 00:04:48,839
5万亿美元超大规模算力投资
101
00:04:48,839 --> 00:04:52,750
从2025年至2027年的资本支出
102
00:04:52,750 --> 00:04:54,689
这里情况变得严峻了
103
00:04:54,689 --> 00:04:56,750
科技行业可能需要一点
104
00:04:56,750 --> 00:04:59,720
五万亿美元的新债务来融资
105
00:04:59,720 --> 00:05:01,620
新增债务未被留存
106
00:05:01,620 --> 00:05:03,540
靠借贷维持收益
107
00:05:03,540 --> 00:05:06,199
我希望你仔细想想这一点
108
00:05:06,360 --> 00:05:07,519
上一次是什么时候
109
00:05:07,519 --> 00:05:09,860
整个行业承担了一千五百亿美元
110
00:05:09,860 --> 00:05:12,279
借债建造尚未验证
111
00:05:12,279 --> 00:05:13,779
能自给自足的东西
112
00:05:13,779 --> 00:05:16,500
这个问题有明确答案
113
00:05:17,660 --> 00:05:19,500
1999年
114
00:05:19,709 --> 00:05:23,110
但达里奥的话改变了整个计算
115
00:05:24,110 --> 00:05:28,970
他开始谈论一个决定让技术免费的国家
116
00:05:29,250 --> 00:05:32,298
当我看到这一点时
117
00:05:32,579 --> 00:05:35,519
这现在有重大影响
118
00:05:35,519 --> 00:05:39,569
在我看来AI啊
119
00:05:39,569 --> 00:05:40,829
基本上在吞噬一切
120
00:05:42,149 --> 00:05:44,430
甚至可能自食其果
121
00:05:45,548 --> 00:05:51,600
我的意思是无法产生足够利润
122
00:05:51,600 --> 00:05:54,160
我们不能仅从国内视角看待
123
00:05:54,160 --> 00:05:57,100
还需观察中国的情况
124
00:05:57,100 --> 00:06:00,600
并做出有趣区分
125
00:06:00,600 --> 00:06:01,240
你知道的
126
00:06:01,240 --> 00:06:06,430
中美经济理念存在差异
127
00:06:06,589 --> 00:06:09,910
美国和中国经济运作方式不同
128
00:06:09,910 --> 00:06:14,670
我们主要以利润为基础
129
00:06:15,350 --> 00:06:22,170
他们可能认为利润是次要考量
130
00:06:22,170 --> 00:06:27,209
未必需要追求利润才能最佳
131
00:06:27,209 --> 00:06:28,230
例如
132
00:06:28,230 --> 00:06:29,629
在中国
133
00:06:29,629 --> 00:06:35,310
他们会说AI使用非常棒
134
00:06:35,310 --> 00:06:38,978
应该像电力一样
135
00:06:38,978 --> 00:06:40,718
让所有人免费使用
136
00:06:42,158 --> 00:06:45,158
并开源给所有人
137
00:06:45,968 --> 00:06:46,329
好的
138
00:06:46,329 --> 00:06:48,569
他们可能获得更高使用率
139
00:06:48,569 --> 00:06:52,740
通过使用实现生产力提升
140
00:06:52,939 --> 00:06:56,779
我们靠利润体系偿还
141
00:06:57,209 --> 00:06:57,629
好的
142
00:06:57,629 --> 00:06:57,889
嗯
143
00:06:57,889 --> 00:06:59,509
现在我们进入一个世界
144
00:06:59,509 --> 00:07:01,050
如何在这个世界竞争
145
00:07:01,050 --> 00:07:01,930
该如何应对
146
00:07:01,930 --> 00:07:02,490
换句话说
147
00:07:02,490 --> 00:07:06,560
想象他们的技术几乎和我们一样好
148
00:07:06,560 --> 00:07:09,550
因为他们已接近我们水平
149
00:07:09,550 --> 00:07:10,610
嗯
150
00:07:10,610 --> 00:07:13,589
然后但你可以免费获取它们
151
00:07:14,870 --> 00:07:16,350
开源
152
00:07:16,839 --> 00:07:17,240
好的
153
00:07:17,240 --> 00:07:18,399
现在你得偿还这笔债
154
00:07:19,680 --> 00:07:19,939
好的
155
00:07:19,939 --> 00:07:23,720
所以我想强调的是
156
00:07:23,720 --> 00:07:32,439
这些也是系统性风险,会进入AI吞噬一切的图景中
157
00:07:32,439 --> 00:07:34,509
它甚至可能自食其果
158
00:07:34,509 --> 00:07:36,509
当我第一次听到这句话
159
00:07:36,509 --> 00:07:38,769
我以为他在谈论竞争
160
00:07:38,769 --> 00:07:40,480
压缩利润空间
161
00:07:40,480 --> 00:07:41,819
常规内容
162
00:07:41,819 --> 00:07:43,800
但中国细节的出现
163
00:07:43,800 --> 00:07:45,920
彻底改变了我的思维模型
164
00:07:46,920 --> 00:07:50,339
这里有证据显示在2025年1月
165
00:07:50,339 --> 00:07:54,000
中国实验室DeepSea发布了一款前沿级
166
00:07:54,000 --> 00:08:01,129
推理模型训练成本为559.7万美元
167
00:08:01,370 --> 00:08:05,449
美国领先模型则需1.12亿美元
168
00:08:05,449 --> 00:08:07,870
成本高出18倍
169
00:08:07,870 --> 00:08:10,610
而DeepSea模型表现相当
170
00:08:11,730 --> 00:08:13,899
想想这其中的速度差异
171
00:08:13,899 --> 00:08:17,459
中国以成本十分之一实现前沿性能
172
00:08:18,459 --> 00:08:21,798
他们以MIT开源协议发布
173
00:08:21,798 --> 00:08:25,649
免费开放且运行有效
174
00:08:25,649 --> 00:08:33,019
中国AI模型一年内市场份额从1%跃升至15%
175
00:08:33,019 --> 00:08:36,899
阿里巴巴的Qun模型在Hugging Face上线后
176
00:08:36,899 --> 00:08:39,659
截至2026年1月已获7亿次下载
177
00:08:39,659 --> 00:08:42,000
关键在于速度
178
00:08:42,000 --> 00:08:44,779
中国并非推出稍优产品
179
00:08:44,779 --> 00:08:48,779
他们打造了更快更便宜的方案并公开技术路线
180
00:08:49,019 --> 00:08:50,399
这就是冷冰冰的数学
181
00:08:50,399 --> 00:08:52,039
Dahlia指向
182
00:08:52,039 --> 00:08:54,419
如果中国将AI视为公共产品
183
00:08:54,419 --> 00:08:57,240
使用即免费
184
00:08:57,240 --> 00:09:00,679
其模型建造成本降低95%
185
00:09:00,679 --> 00:09:02,700
那商业模式究竟如何
186
00:09:02,700 --> 00:09:06,639
能支撑美国每年6750亿美元的支出
187
00:09:06,639 --> 00:09:07,860
这不是修辞
188
00:09:07,940 --> 00:09:09,909
禁止公司分析指出
189
00:09:09,909 --> 00:09:16,250
AI需在2030年前年营收达2000亿美元
190
00:09:16,250 --> 00:09:19,269
以合理现有基建投入
191
00:09:19,549 --> 00:09:24,169
这意味着营收需四年增长十倍
192
00:09:24,450 --> 00:09:28,830
而MIT斯隆研究显示
193
00:09:28,830 --> 00:09:31,409
95%企业报告生成式AI投资无回报
194
00:09:31,409 --> 00:09:33,339
截至2025年中期
195
00:09:33,339 --> 00:09:37,158
不是低回报而是零回报
196
00:09:37,158 --> 00:09:39,830
财务表仍为空白
197
00:09:39,830 --> 00:09:41,309
目前英伟达
198
00:09:41,309 --> 00:09:42,750
市盈率处于
199
00:09:42,750 --> 00:09:46,289
即股价除以下一年预期收益
200
00:09:46,289 --> 00:09:48,509
相当于每赚一美元需支付多少
201
00:09:48,509 --> 00:09:52,070
未来利润约为四三
202
00:09:52,070 --> 00:09:55,230
这假设增长列车不会减速
203
00:09:55,230 --> 00:09:57,960
这假设收入能够实现
204
00:09:57,960 --> 00:10:01,000
并且假设没有人将价格压至零
205
00:10:02,320 --> 00:10:05,399
每一个假设现在都受到质疑
206
00:10:05,870 --> 00:10:10,529
最强的看涨论点来自Funstrat的汤姆·李,他的论点
207
00:10:10,529 --> 00:10:12,789
这些并非风投支持的初创公司
208
00:10:12,789 --> 00:10:13,429
烧钱运营
209
00:10:13,429 --> 00:10:16,320
就像两千年的苹果微软
210
00:10:16,320 --> 00:10:17,179
英伟达
211
00:10:17,179 --> 00:10:20,340
他们是人类历史上最赚钱的公司
212
00:10:20,340 --> 00:10:22,419
他们正在动用自己的利润
213
00:10:22,419 --> 00:10:24,000
而非借入资金
214
00:10:24,000 --> 00:10:28,120
并且已从AI中看到实际生产力提升
215
00:10:28,399 --> 00:10:29,899
这是一个合理的观点
216
00:10:29,899 --> 00:10:34,990
英伟达去年财年营收达1305亿美元
217
00:10:34,990 --> 00:10:40,009
同比增长140%,毛利率接近75%
218
00:10:40,009 --> 00:10:41,490
这才是真正的商业
219
00:10:41,490 --> 00:10:42,070
印刷
220
00:10:42,070 --> 00:10:43,299
真金白银
221
00:10:43,299 --> 00:10:44,659
但两点削弱了
222
00:10:44,659 --> 00:10:46,600
他的论点首先
223
00:10:46,600 --> 00:10:48,789
我想在此保持精准
224
00:10:48,789 --> 00:10:50,190
高盛估计
225
00:10:50,190 --> 00:10:51,649
科技行业需要1.5万亿美元新债用于AI
226
00:10:51,649 --> 00:10:53,990
基础设施投资,动用自身利润
227
00:10:53,990 --> 00:10:57,850
仅说明部分故事
228
00:10:57,850 --> 00:10:59,509
当你在如此规模下同时增加资产负债表
229
00:10:59,509 --> 00:11:03,448
第二点才是关键
230
00:11:03,448 --> 00:11:06,009
这也是让我夜不能寐的部分
231
00:11:06,009 --> 00:11:07,609
李的整个框架
232
00:11:07,609 --> 00:11:08,249
假设美国公司
233
00:11:08,249 --> 00:11:11,328
能为AI收取溢价价格
234
00:11:11,328 --> 00:11:15,710
如果中国策略奏效,这种定价权将消失
235
00:11:15,710 --> 00:11:18,509
看涨论点建立在AI保持高价的世界
236
00:11:19,669 --> 00:11:22,590
达霍警告的是AI价格崩塌的世界
237
00:11:22,830 --> 00:11:24,990
这对您个人意味着什么
238
00:11:26,470 --> 00:11:28,309
让我介绍马库斯
239
00:11:28,309 --> 00:11:31,330
他42岁,运营西雅图的投资组合
240
00:11:31,330 --> 00:11:36,190
2026年1月他买入标普500指数基金
241
00:11:36,190 --> 00:11:38,070
他认为自己分散了风险
242
00:11:38,070 --> 00:11:39,809
认为十分安全
243
00:11:39,809 --> 00:11:42,350
然后他做了计算
244
00:11:43,350 --> 00:11:44,529
如果你持有标准
245
00:11:44,529 --> 00:11:46,340
标普500指数基金
246
00:11:46,340 --> 00:11:48,019
大约32%至36%
247
00:11:48,019 --> 00:11:52,679
你的资金集中在十大科技公司
248
00:11:52,840 --> 00:11:53,480
苹果
249
00:11:53,480 --> 00:11:54,419
微软
250
00:11:54,419 --> 00:11:55,500
英伟达
251
00:11:55,500 --> 00:11:56,179
亚马逊
252
00:11:56,179 --> 00:11:58,059
字母表和元
253
00:11:58,059 --> 00:12:01,710
每一个都在押注巨大的人工智能
254
00:12:01,710 --> 00:12:06,289
马库斯将他两百万美元投资组合中的六万七千美元
255
00:12:06,289 --> 00:12:08,259
都集中在那十只股票上
256
00:12:08,259 --> 00:12:09,179
一个点
257
00:12:09,179 --> 00:12:11,139
仅人工智能领域就可能出现类似互联网泡沫的回调
258
00:12:11,139 --> 00:12:15,769
可能让标普指数下跌15%到20%对马库斯
259
00:12:15,769 --> 00:12:18,470
这意味着三万到四万美元面临风险
260
00:12:18,470 --> 00:12:19,490
基于这一假设
261
00:12:19,490 --> 00:12:23,419
他从未明确阐述大部分风险是隐形的
262
00:12:24,620 --> 00:12:26,320
这是我个人会做的测试
263
00:12:26,320 --> 00:12:29,379
这也是马库斯后来才做的测试
264
00:12:29,379 --> 00:12:35,840
你能具体说明你的投资组合中的人工智能公司如何产生足够收入来证明
265
00:12:35,840 --> 00:12:38,818
到2030年每年两万亿美元的规模
266
00:12:38,818 --> 00:12:39,979
如果你不能
267
00:12:39,979 --> 00:12:42,078
你可能正在完全照搬达里奥
268
00:12:42,078 --> 00:12:44,698
刚刚警告的科技押注风险
269
00:12:44,698 --> 00:12:47,379
当你以为在押注公司时
270
00:12:47,659 --> 00:12:49,818
让我理清这些线索
271
00:12:49,818 --> 00:12:53,519
达莉亚的框架指出我们处于经济衰退第五阶段
272
00:12:53,519 --> 00:12:58,629
晚期阶段,劣质企业面临内部分裂和外部威胁
273
00:12:58,629 --> 00:13:01,899
这就是叠加在宏观背景上的情况
274
00:13:01,899 --> 00:13:05,320
历史上最大的资本支出周期
275
00:13:05,320 --> 00:13:10,009
瞄准一个竞争对手国家试图使其免费的技术
276
00:13:10,330 --> 00:13:12,690
人工智能将改变世界
277
00:13:12,690 --> 00:13:16,049
我真正相信这项技术有效
278
00:13:16,049 --> 00:13:17,090
它正在进步
279
00:13:17,090 --> 00:13:19,099
并且不会消失
280
00:13:19,379 --> 00:13:24,739
但六百七十亿美元年支出依赖的盈利模式
281
00:13:24,739 --> 00:13:27,099
这才是被攻击的环节
282
00:13:27,099 --> 00:13:29,658
如果中国开源模型持续追赶
283
00:13:29,658 --> 00:13:31,860
性能差距和证据
284
00:13:31,860 --> 00:13:32,940
正如现状所示
285
00:13:32,940 --> 00:13:39,549
美国企业的收入上限可能远低于当前定价
286
00:13:39,549 --> 00:13:40,490
我想强调
287
00:13:40,490 --> 00:13:42,730
可能推翻达霍观点的因素
288
00:13:42,730 --> 00:13:46,450
中国的开源优势可能阻碍监管
289
00:13:46,450 --> 00:13:49,450
出口限制或技术突破让美国
290
00:13:49,450 --> 00:13:51,190
实验室垄断
291
00:13:51,549 --> 00:13:56,220
华盛顿可能加征关税或限制保护国内人工智能利润
292
00:13:56,220 --> 00:13:57,899
不确定性确实存在
293
00:13:57,899 --> 00:14:02,450
任何声称完全了解结果的人都在兜售东西
294
00:14:02,610 --> 00:14:06,210
但当前的集中化风险确实存在
295
00:14:06,210 --> 00:14:09,250
而大多数指数基金持有者毫不知情
296
00:14:09,250 --> 00:14:10,950
他们正在承担
297
00:14:11,350 --> 00:14:12,870
如果你喜欢这个视频
298
00:14:12,870 --> 00:14:15,409
请点赞并观看下一集视频
299
00:14:15,409 --> 00:14:20,210
在那里比尔·阿克曼揭示可能七十年来最大的投资机遇
300
00:14:20,570 --> 00:14:22,889
我们下期再见